| 2,613 | 9 | 114 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
目的基于自我控制双系统模型的视角,探究手机成瘾对学业拖延的影响以及自我控制双系统和认知情绪调节策略在其中的作用机制。方法采用手机成瘾指数量表(mobile phone addiction index scale, MPAI)中文版、学业拖延量表(procrastination assessment scale-students, PASS)、青少年自我控制双系统量表(dual-mode of self-control scale, DMSC-S)以及认知情绪调节问卷中文版(cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire, Chinese version, CERQ-C)对某医学院458名大学生进行问卷调查。结果手机成瘾可正向预测大学生的学业拖延(β=0.434,P<0.001)。冲动系统在手机成瘾和学业拖延之间起部分中介作用(95%CI:0.065～0.178),效应估计值为0.118,中介效应占总效应的27.19%;而控制系统的中介作用不显著。适应性调节策略可以正向调节冲动系统中介作用的后半段路径(INDEX=0.045, 95%CI:0.003～0.092);非适应性策略的调节作用不显著。结论手机成瘾可以通过冲动系统对大学生学业拖延产生影响,且该中介作用还会受到适应性调节策略的调节。
Abstract：Objective To explore the effect of mobile phone addiction on academic procrastination, and investigate the mediating role of self-control dual system and whether cognitive emotion regulation strategies play a moderating role in this mediating process based on a dual system theory. Methods The mobile phone addiction index(MPAI) scale, the procrastination assessment scale-students(PASS), the dual-mode of self-control scale(DMSC-S), and cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire-Chinese version(CERQ-C) were administered to a sample of 458 students from a medical college. Results Mobile phone addiction can significantly predict college students' academic procrastination(β=0.434, P<0.001). The impulse system mediated the relationship between mobile phone addiction and academic procrastination(95%CI: 0.065-0.178). The effect estimate was 0.118 and the mediating effect accounted for 27.19% of the total effect. And the mediating effect of the control system did not reach statistical significance. The relationship between impulse system and procrastination was moderated by adaptive cognitive emotion regulation strategies(INDEX=0.045, 95%CI: 0.003-0.092). And the moderating effect of maladaptive cognitive emotion regulation strategies did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion Mobile phone addiction can affect academic procrastination through the impulse system and the adaptive cognitive emotion regulation strategies can moderate the mediating model.
[1] YEN C F,TANG T,YEN J Y,et al.Symptoms of problematic cellular phone use,functional impairment and its association with depression among adolescents in Southern Taiwan[J].J Adolesc,2009,32(4):863-873.
[2] 刘勤学，杨燕，林悦，等.智能手机成瘾：概念、测量及影响因素[J].中国临床心理学杂志，2017,25(1):82-87.
[3] JUN S.The reciprocal longitudinal relationships between mobile phone addiction and depressive symptoms among Korean adolescents[J].Comput Hum Behav,2016(58):179-186.
[4] DEMIRCI K,AKG?NüL M,AKPINAR A.Relationship of smartphone use severity with sleep quality,depression,and anxiety in university students[J].J Behav Addict,2015,4(2):85-92.
[5] SAMAHA M,HAWI N S.Relationships among smartphone addiction,stress,academic performance,and satisfaction with life[J].Comput Hum Behav,2016(57):321-325.
[6] 高斌，朱穗京，吴晶玲.大学生手机成瘾与学习投入的关系：自我控制的中介作用和核心自我评价的调节作用[J].心理发展与教育，2021,37(3):400-406.
[7] 张潮，翟琳，王畅.大学生自我控制在手机依赖和学业拖延中的中介作用[J].中国健康心理学杂志，2017,25(1):145-148.
[8] 陈武.手机使用对青少年自我控制的影响：基于解释水平理论[D].武汉：华中师范大学，2016.
[9] HOFMANN W,FRIESE M,STRACK F.Impulse and self-control from a dual-systems perspective[J].Perspect Psychol Sci,2009,4(2):162-176.
[10] WILLS T A,STOOLMILLER M.The role of self-control in early escalation of substance use:a time-varying analysis[J].J Consult Clin Psychol,2002,70(4):986-997.
[11] WILLS T A,WALKER C,MENDOZA D,et al.Behavioral and emotional self-control:relations to substance use in samples of middle and high school students[J].Psychol Addict Behav,2006,20(3):265-278.
[12] 卜庆阳.自我控制的内涵：基于资源模型与双系统模型的解释[J].社会心理科学，2016,31(12):17-20.
[13] STEEL P,K?NIG C J.Integrating theories of motivation[J].Acad Manage Rev,2006,31(4):889-913.
[14] 叶宝娟，郑清，蔡蓓.情绪调节策略对压力性生活事件与工读生病理性网络使用关系的调节作用[J].中国临床心理学杂志，2015,23(1):80-83.
[15] 宫盛花，郑清.应对方式对大学生网络成瘾的影响：情绪调节策略的调节作用[J].中国特殊教育，2016(10):91-96.
[16] SHOREY R C,MCNULTY J K,MOORE T M,et al.Emotion regulation moderates the association between proximal negative affect and intimate partner violence perpetration[J].Prev Sci,2015,16(6):873-880.
[17] 陈红丽.大学生学业拖延与情绪状态及其调节方式的关系研究[D].石家庄：河北师范大学，2009.
[18] GARNEFSKI N,KRAAIJ V,SPINHOVEN P.Negative life events,cognitive emotion regulation and emotional problems[J].Pers Individ Dif,2001,30(8):1311-1327.
[19] 宋梅歌，苏缇，冯廷勇.拖延行为的时间取向模型[J].心理科学进展，2015,23(7):1216-1225.
[20] 徐晓丹.手机成瘾大学生自我控制缺陷及其机制[D].重庆：西南大学，2014.
[21] LEUNG L.Linking psychological attributes to addiction and improper use of the mobile phone among adolescents in Hong Kong[J].J Child Media,2008,2(2):93-113.
[22] 黄海，牛露颖，周春燕，等.手机依赖指数中文版在大学生中的信效度检验[J].中国临床心理学杂志，2014,22(5):835-838.
[23] 关雪菁.折扣机制与任务性质对学业拖延行为的影响研究[D].长春：东北师范大学，2006.
[24] 谢东杰，王利刚，陶婷，等.青少年自我控制双系统量表中文版的效度和信度[J].中国心理卫生杂志，2014,28(5):386-391.
[25] 朱熊兆，罗伏生，姚树桥，等.认知情绪调节问卷中文版(CERQ-C)的信效度研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志，2007,15(2):121-124.
[26] PODSAKOFF P M,MACKENZIE S B,LEE J Y,et al.Common method biases in behavioral research:a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies[J].J Appl Psychol,2003,88(5):879-903.
[27] 李春生.大学生手机依赖与孤独感及感觉寻求的关系研究[D].苏州：苏州大学，2015.
[28] 何玲.情绪与情绪调节策略对不同感觉寻求运动员冲动行为的影响[D].北京：北京体育大学，2019.
[29] LIU P,FENG T.The overlapping brain region accounting for the relationship between procrastination and impulsivity:a voxel-based morphometry study[J].Neuroscience,2017(360):9-17.
[30] 张静怡，崔雪英，陶婷，等.青年人人格、自我控制双系统与拖延的关系[J].中国心理卫生杂志，2019,33(3):232-237.
[31] 张亚梅，黄海，胡梦岩，等.大学生神经质人格与手机依赖的关系：主观幸福感和认知失败的中介作用[J].中国临床心理学杂志，2020,28(2):359-363.
[32] 程华倩.基于双系统理论模型的网络暴力成因研究[J].戏剧之家，2020(9):186-188.
[33] WO■ NY ?.On incentives,temptation and self-control[J].Math Soc Sci,2015(74):60-67.
[34] 韦育坤.大学生生活事件、认知情绪调节与压力后成长的关系[D].桂林：广西师范大学，2018.
[35] THOITS P A.Patterns in coping with controllable and uncontrollable events[M]//CUMMINGS EM,GREENE A L,KARRAKER K H.Life-span developmental psychology:perspectives on stress and coping.London:Psychology Press,1991:235-260.
[36] 凌宇，彭君，钟明天，等.应激与认知情绪调节策略对大学生抑郁症状的预测研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志，2014,22(3):504-507.
[37] 高伟，陈圣栋，龙泉杉，等.情绪调节研究方法的蜕变：从有意情绪调节到自动化情绪调节[J].科学通报，2018,63(4):415-424.
[38] 詹鋆，任俊.自我控制与自我控制资源[J].心理科学进展，2012,20(9):1457-1466.
[39] 于美琪.三种情绪调节策略的效果和资源消耗的比较[D].南昌：江西中医药大学，2019.
[40] DING N,YANG J,LIU Y,et al.Paying less but harvesting more:the effect of unconscious acceptance in regulating frustrating emotion[J].Sci China Life Sci,2015,58(8):799-809.
[41] 王利刚，谢东杰，樊春雷，等.自我控制的干预技术研究：基于双系统理论[J].中国临床心理学杂志，2014,22(2):377-380.
基本信息:
中图分类号:G442
引用信息:
[1]王丽君,陈嫄,王丹娜,等.手机成瘾与大学生学业拖延：有调节的中介模型[J].教育生物学杂志,2021,9(05):358-365.
基金信息:
四川省大学生创新创业训练计划项目(S201910736105)